The Advocate had downloaded the photo of the Hon'ble judge from her Facebook account and attached it on a birthday card and sent it by email to the Hon’ble Judge. The Hon'ble Madhya Pradesh High Court will hear Today a bail plea filed by a Advocate who was jailed for sending birthday wishes to a Hon'ble judge by downloaded the photo of the judge from her Facebook account and attached it on a birthday card.#advocate #vijaysinghyadav #mp pic.twitter.com/Lgh1ThVhGb
— Legal Advisory (@LegalAdvisory07) March 3, 2021
The Madhya Pradesh High Court will hear Today a bail plea filed by a Advocate who was jailed for sending birthday wishes to a above mentioned Hon'ble judge.
The Advocate had downloaded the photo of the Hon'ble judge from her Facebook account and attached it on a birthday card and sent it by email to the Hon’ble Judge.
The Hon'ble Madhya Pradesh High Court will hear Today a bail plea filed by a Advocate who was jailed for sending birthday wishes to a Hon'ble judge by downloaded the photo of the judge from her Facebook account and attached it on a birthday card.#advocate #vijaysinghyadav #mp pic.twitter.com/Lgh1ThVhGb
— Legal Advisory (@LegalAdvisory07) March 3, 2021
The Madhya Pradesh High Court will hear Today a bail plea filed by a Advocate who was jailed for sending birthday wishes to a above mentioned Hon'ble judge.
Also Read - Aisha Arif Khan, recorded a heartrending video clip on her mobile phone, with a smile on her face, Before Suicide by Jumping into the Sabarmati river Ahmedabad
On February 9, 2021 the Ratlam Police had arrested advocate i.e. Vijay singh Yadav after he sent Judicial Magistrate (First Class).Mithali Pathak an email and a birthday card on January 29. It was alleged that he had downloaded Pathak's photo from her Facebook account and attached it with the birthday wish/card.
In the complaint, it has been alleged that Yadav had downloaded the photo of the judge without any authorization and sent the email to her official account.
Further, since he was not added as a friend on the Hon’ble ljudge's Facebook account, such 'unauthorized access' or use of the photograph would attract provisions of the Information Technology Act.
In the complaint, it has been alleged that Yadav had downloaded the photo of the judge without any authorization and sent the email to her official account.
Also Read - PUBLICATION OF MARRIAGE NOTICE UNDER SPECIAL MARRIAGE ACT IS VIOLATI
The First Information Report (FIR) was lodged for offences under Section 420 (Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property), 467 (Forgery of valuable security ), 468 (Forgery for purpose of cheating), 469 (Forgery for purpose of harming reputation) of the Indian Penal Code 1860 and Section 41 read with 67 (Punishment for publishing or transmitting obscene material in electronic form) of the Information Technology Act, 2000.
Also Read - Address me as "Sir", not "My Lord" or "Lordship", urges Calcutta High Court Chief Justice Thottathil B Radhakrishnan
On February 13, the family members of the accused had applied for bail on his behalf, but the same was rejected.This prompted Yadav to approach the Madhya Pradesh High Court. He will be represented by advocate KK Gupta before the High Court.
The First Information Report (FIR) was lodged for offences under Section 420 (Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property), 467 (Forgery of valuable security ), 468 (Forgery for purpose of cheating), 469 (Forgery for purpose of harming reputation) of the Indian Penal Code 1860 and Section 41 read with 67 (Punishment for publishing or transmitting obscene material in electronic form) of the Information Technology Act, 2000.
Also Read - Address me as "Sir", not "My Lord" or "Lordship", urges Calcutta High Court Chief Justice Thottathil B Radhakrishnan
This prompted Yadav to approach the Madhya Pradesh High Court. He will be represented by advocate KK Gupta before the High Court.
In the bail plea, Yadav has contended that he has been implicated with unnecessary and unwanted charges. He has submitted that there was "no intention" to deteriorate the reputation of the hon'ble judge. Moreover, he has claimed that he does not possess much knowledge about 'internet access' and social media.
The Indore single Bench of the High Court will hear the matter today.
In the bail plea, Yadav has contended that he has been implicated with unnecessary and unwanted charges. He has submitted that there was "no intention" to deteriorate the reputation of the hon'ble judge. Moreover, he has claimed that he does not possess much knowledge about 'internet access' and social media.
The Indore single Bench of the High Court will hear the matter today.
Also Read - 10 Civil Rights & Legal Rights Every Indian Citizen Should Be know
Details of case filed before the Hon’ble Court.
Details of case filed before the Hon’ble Court.
Trending Articles
6- Are Indian Muslims using secularism for their profit making ?
8- 10 Civil Rights & Legal Rights Every Indian Citizen Should Be know
9- WHETHER THE LEASE RENT COVERED UNDER THE OPERATIONAL CREDITOR OR NOT
10- Legal Procedures for Suing An Employer For Harassment Or Discrimination to Employee In India
0 Comments
Please do not enter any spam link in the comment box.